论文部分内容阅读
目的应用层次分析法、TOPSIS法、加权秩和比法对新疆流感监测网络(包括17个哨点医院及14个网络实验室所在疾控中心)进行综合评价,以期获得各监测单位流感监测工作真实水平;结合新疆流感监测实际情况,探讨三种综合评价方法在新疆流感监测网络监测质量评价中应用的适用性。方法参考《全国流感监测工作质量评估方案(试行稿)》,依据新疆流感监测网络监测工作质量评价指标体系,分别采用层次分析法、TOPSIS法、加权秩和比法进行综合评价。结果 TOPSIS法、加权秩和比法与层次分析法排序首位及末位的监测单位均一致,其余排名中间的监测单位位次略有不同。结论通过3种方法的应用,从不同角度综合分析了各地工作质量优劣,各哨点医院及网络实验室流感监测工作质量差异较大;3种评价方法的结果排序相近、可靠、客观,能够应用于流感监测网络监测工作质量评价,可作为常规评价方法。
Objective To evaluate the flu surveillance network in Xinjiang (including 17 sentinel hospitals and 14 network laboratories) by AHP, TOPSIS and weighted rank sum ratio method, in order to get the real situation of influenza surveillance in all monitoring units Level; combined with the actual situation of flu surveillance in Xinjiang, to discuss the applicability of three kinds of comprehensive evaluation methods in Xinjiang flu surveillance network monitoring quality evaluation. Methods According to the “National Influenza Surveillance Quality Evaluation Program (Trial Version)”, based on the indicator system of Xinjiang influenza surveillance network monitoring work quality, the methods of AHP, TOPSIS and weighted rank sum ratio were respectively used for comprehensive evaluation. Results The TOPSIS method, the weighted rank sum ratio method and the AHP method were the same for the first and the last monitoring units, while the monitoring units in the middle of the other ranks were slightly different in position. Conclusion Through the application of the three methods, the quality of work around the country is comprehensively analyzed from different perspectives, and the quality of influenza surveillance among sentinel hospitals and network laboratories is quite different. The results of three evaluation methods are similar, reliable and objective Applied to the quality monitoring of influenza surveillance network monitoring, can be used as a routine evaluation method.