论文部分内容阅读
不作为犯一直以来都是一个引人注目的难题,关于行为人特定义务的根据以及来源之一的先行行为是不作为犯中讨论的重中之重。尽管我国把先行行为作为不作为犯的义务来源之一,但是笔者认为,其在法理依据上缺乏科学规范的研究和规定。本文即通过对现有研究结论的比较分析得出先行行为作为不纯正不作为犯罪的义务来源的依据是法律规范。
Inaction has always been a compelling challenge, with prioritization based on the specific obligations of the perpetrator and on the basis of one of its origins as the most important of the non-actions discussed. Although our country takes the precedent as one of the sources of obligations of omission, the author believes that it lacks scientific norms research and regulation on the basis of jurisprudence. In this paper, through comparative analysis of the existing research conclusions, it is the legal norms that the leading behavior as the source of obligation of impure omission crime is the law.