论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨不同类型文章的影响力及其对影响因子的贡献情况,为论文和期刊评价提供依据。方法:根据临床医学期刊的实际状况,参照《中国学术期刊(光盘版)检索与评价数据范围》的文献标识码规定,逐条分析A、B、C、D、E五种文章的影响力及其对影响因子的贡献大小。结果:按影响力排优的文章类别为A>B>C> D>E。对影响因子贡献概率最大的为A、B、D三类。结论:①评价文章的优劣应侧重考察其影响力的核心因素——原创性、科学性、时效性,②评估期刊的优劣应着重者察A、B、C类论文的质量、数量和比重,辅以考察期刊影响因子。
Objectives: To explore the influence of different types of articles and their contribution to the impact of factors, to provide a basis for the evaluation of papers and journals. Methods: According to the actual status of clinical medical journals, referring to the document identification code of “China Academic Journals (CD-ROM version) Retrieval and Evaluation Data Range”, the influence of A, B, C, D and E articles and their influence The contribution of the impact factor size. Results: The article categories ranked by influence ranked A> B> C> D> E. The greatest contribution to the impact of factors for the A, B, D three categories. Conclusion: ① The evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the article should focus on the core factors of its impact - original, scientific, timeliness, ② evaluation of the pros and cons of journals should focus on the quality of A, B, C papers, the number and The proportion, supplemented by study periodical impact factor.