论文部分内容阅读
S.388《字样》残卷中的反切和直音用字与《切韵》系韵书、“颜注”不完全相同,音类却完全相同。从音注所反映的语音现象可以证明该残卷书写的时间是在初唐并且反映的是当时实际使用的读书音。
S.388 “type” residual volume in the anti-cut and direct pronunciation of the word and “cut rhyme” Department of rhyme book, “Yan Note” is not exactly the same, the sound is exactly the same. The phonetic phenomenon reflected in the sound note proves that the time of the handicapped handwriting was in the early Tang Dynasty and reflected the actually used reading sound at that time.