论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨分析急性心肌梗死患者的临床急救效果。方法选取我院2013年5月至2014年6月的急性心肌梗死患者100例,将其随机分为两组,对照组和观察组,每组50例患者。对照组为患者家属送往我院急诊科的患者,观察组为在送往医院前对其进行急救措施的患者。后对两组患者的存活率、住院时间、并发症记录统计并进行比较。结果经我院的治疗后。对照组患者存活率为82%,观察组患者存活率为98%,明显优于对照组,差异较大,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组患者住院时间为(19.3±3.2)d,观察组患者住院时间为(7.6±2.1)d,明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组患者并发症的发生率为44%,观察组患者并发症的发生率为10%,明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论从我院的研究可看出,对于急性心肌梗死患者对其进行院前急救措施可增加患者存活率,缩短住院时间,减少并发症的发生,在临床治疗中具有良好的效果,应在临床中广泛应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical emergency response in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 100 acute myocardial infarction patients from May 2013 to June 2014 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups, control group and observation group, with 50 patients in each group. Patients in the control group were sent to the emergency department of our hospital from their relatives and the observation group were patients who were given first aid before they were taken to the hospital. After the two groups of patients survival rate, hospitalization time, complication records statistics and compared. After the results of our hospital treatment. The survival rate of the control group was 82%, the survival rate of the observation group was 98%, which was significantly better than the control group, with a significant difference (P <0.05). The length of stay in the control group was (19.3 ± 3.2) days, and the length of stay in the observation group was (7.6 ± 2.1) days, which was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the control group was 44%, and the incidence of complications in the observation group was 10%, which was significantly less than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion From our study, we can see that pre-hospital emergency measures for patients with acute myocardial infarction can increase the survival rate, shorten the hospital stay and reduce the incidence of complications in clinical treatment with good results should be clinical Widely used.