一、引言(1)对老子和庄子经典文本的解读之一,是他们为维护中立、客观和宿命的“道”的至高地位而忽视了适当地关注人类和伦理(2)。此类解读早在儒家传统如荀子著述中就已出现,并且在当代宗教和世俗人格主义批评家对早期道家思想批判中仍然很普遍。批评家们认为,道家缺乏伦理人格和道德主体的概 I. INTRODUCTION (1) One of the interpretations of the classic texts of Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu is that they neglect to properly pay attention to human beings and ethics (2) in order to maintain their supreme status in neutrality, objectivity and destiny. Such interpretations have emerged as early as Confucian traditions such as Xunzi’s writings, and are still commonplace in the critique of early Taoism by contemporary religious and secularist critics of personality. Critics argue that Taoism lacks ethics and ethics