论文部分内容阅读
目的 :比较腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)和开腹子宫全切术(TAH)的临床应用价值。方法 :回顾性分析我院2011年3月至2012年9月需行子宫全切术的180例患者的临床资料。结果 :90例腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的患者术后肛门排气时间、术后腹痛消失时间、留置导尿时间、伤口非甲级愈合率和住院时间等有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论 :腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术较开腹子宫全切术有明显的优势,其不增加手术时间和副损伤,创伤小、恢复快、术中出血少、住院时间短,具有很大的临床价值。
Objective: To compare the clinical value of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and open hysterectomy (TAH). Methods: The clinical data of 180 patients who underwent hysterectomy from March 2011 to September 2012 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Results: There were significant differences in 90 patients with laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy after anal exhaust time, disappearance of abdominal pain after operation, indwelling catheterization time, non-grade wound healing rate and hospitalization time (P <0.05) . Conclusion: Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy has obvious advantages over open hysterectomy, which does not increase the operation time and minor injuries, has less trauma, faster recovery, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, Clinical Value.