论文部分内容阅读
当前我国学者对终身监禁的各种法律定性,不仅缺乏从立法技术层面考量的维度,而且在说理逻辑方面也存在重大问题。终身监禁的适用条件需要符合“数额+情节”的双重标准,适用对象应针对“原本”被判处死刑立即执行的被告人。从立法规范化角度看,即使赞成不得减刑、假释的制度,也应删除刑法条文中“终身监禁”的表述;从入刑正当性视角看,为避免刑罚适用的不公、刑罚目的背离和司法资源的浪费,应彻底废除不得减刑、假释的规定;从司法适用角度考虑,应慎用甚至不用终身监禁的新规。
At present, the scholars of our country define the various legal qualifications of life imprisonment not only from the dimensions of legislation and technical aspects, but also have major problems in the logic of reasoning. The applicable conditions of life imprisonment need to meet the double standard of “amount + plot”, and the applicable object should be the defendant sentenced to execute the death penalty immediately for “original”. From the legislative standardization point of view, even in favor of the system of commutation and parole, the expression “life imprisonment” in the criminal law provisions should also be deleted. From the perspective of the justification of sentencing, in order to avoid injustice applicable to criminal penalties, The waste of resources should be completely abolished the provisions may not be commutation of sentence and parole; from the perspective of judicial application, should be used with caution even without the new rules of life imprisonment.