首先,是具有自觉的“创新”意识。学术研究的生命力在于不囿成说,另辟蹊径,推陈出新。评判一门学科研究成果价值的高低、意义的大小,重要标准之一,是看其创新内涵所占比例的多少,是看它是否比前人提供了更多的新信息、新思维、新方法。或者说是其成果能否真正“成一家之言”。而陈陈相因,人云亦云,在低层次上作简单的重复性工作的科学研究,“依样画葫芦”的学术赝品,最终只能被学界唾弃,被历史遗忘。令我感到鼓舞的是,长期以来,曾祥芹教授和他的学术同仁所开创的实用文章学和汉文阅读 First, there is a conscious awareness of “innovation.” The vitality of academic research is that it does not mean that another way, innovation. Judging the value of a subject research results, the size of meaning, one of the important criteria is to see how much of the proportion of its innovative content is to see whether it provides more than the previous new information, new ideas, new methods . Or is the result truly “into a family of words.” However, Chen Chenxiang, people and so on, at a low level for simple repetitive work of scientific research, “according to the same gourd” academic fake, and ultimately only be cast aside by the academic community, forgotten by history. I am encouraged by the fact that for a long time Professor Zeng Xiangqin and his academic colleagues have created practical articles and Chinese reading