论文部分内容阅读
选择Scopus与Web of Science平台为对象,统计2005—2014年物理学科优先数字出版(Article in Press)与开放获取(OA)两种学术期刊数字出版模式的论文情况,通过论文的年代分布、国家分布、期刊分布、机构分布、引用情况及变化趋势等,分析出版模式转变对知识传播的影响。结果表明:学术期刊的数字出版模式尚未成为主流出版模式,不能取代传统出版方式;中国等发展中国家学者更易于接受数字出版方式;国家科学院(所)采用数字出版方式多于其他机构;优先数字出版论文的知识流动能力普遍不及OA论文。针对学术期刊数字出版模式的发展现状,提出相应建议,希望可以推动开放科学的实现。
This paper chooses Scopus and Web of Science as the research object, and statistics the dissertation of digital publication mode of Article in Press and OA in 2005-2014. Through the dissertation’s chronological distribution and country distribution , The distribution of periodicals, the distribution of institutions, the situation of reference and the trend of change, and analyzes the impact of the change of publishing modes on knowledge dissemination. The results show that the mode of digital publication of academic journals has not yet become the mainstream mode of publication and can not replace the traditional mode of publication. The scholars of developing countries in China and other developing countries are more receptive to the mode of digital publishing. The National Academy of Sciences adopts more digital publishing than other institutions. Knowledge of the flow of published papers generally less than the flow of OA papers. According to the development status of academic journal digital publication mode, some suggestions are put forward, hoping to promote the realization of open science.