论文部分内容阅读
目的分析末梢血和静脉血血细胞参数的差异。方法资料随机选自2013年9月至2014年9月于本院进行血常规检验者130例,随机分为末梢血组与静脉血组,两组65例,分别进行末梢血、静脉血采集与检测,对比分析末梢血与静脉血的血细胞参数差异。结果检测结果显示,末梢血与静脉血血常规检测的各项参数均存在明显差异,末梢血的红细胞(RBC)、白细胞(WBC)、血红细胞(Hb)与平均血红蛋白体积(MCV)等数值均明显高于静脉血检测值,对比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);而静脉血的血小板计数(PLT)与平均血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)数值则明显高于末梢血的检测值,对比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两种采血方式的平均血红蛋白总量(MCH)、红细胞压积(HCT)检测值对比差异不具统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相较于末梢血,静脉血的血细胞成分更为稳定,其可作为血液检测较好的样本选择,但静脉采血易由于凝血障碍而导致免疫力低下与明显出血,从而诱发感染,因而临床应依据患者实际进行合理选择。
Objective To analyze the differences of peripheral blood and venous blood cells parameters. Method data were randomly selected from September 2013 to September 2014 in our hospital routine blood test 130 cases were randomly divided into peripheral blood group and venous blood group, two groups of 65 cases, respectively, peripheral blood, venous blood collection and Detection, comparative analysis of peripheral blood and venous blood cell parameters differences. Results The results showed that the parameters of peripheral blood and venous blood routine examination were significantly different. RBC, WBC, Hb and MCV of peripheral blood (P <0.05), while the value of platelet count (PLT) and mean hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) in venous blood was significantly higher than that of peripheral blood, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean hemoglobin (MCH) and hematocrit (HCT) between the two methods (P> 0.05). Conclusion Compared with peripheral blood and venous blood, the blood cell components are more stable, which can be used as a good sample for blood test. However, venous blood collection is easy to be caused by coagulation disorder, which leads to low immunity and obvious bleeding. Based on the actual patient to make a reasonable choice.