论文部分内容阅读
“构式语法”认为,人们的语言知识是关于构式的知识;构式有构式意义,而构式意义是独立于填充在构式里的词项的意义的。我们在生成整体论的指引下,从相邻关系视角对其动词的词典义无“给予”义的双及物句进行了再研究,发现SV(NON-GIVE)O(HUMAN)O(THING)所具有的“给予”构式义并非无源之水,不能绝对地说“给予”构式义“不能归因于所涉及的词项”。
“Constructive Grammar” holds that people’s linguistic knowledge is about the knowledge of the structure; the structure has the meaning of the structure, and the meaning of the structure is independent of the meaning of the term filled in the structure. Under the guidance of the theory of holism, we re-studied the double and clause sentences of “verbally” meaning of the verb in the adjoining relation. We found that SV (NON-GIVE) O (HUMAN) O (THING) The “giving” of structural meaning is not a passive water. It can not be absolutely said that “giving” a structural meaning “can not be attributed to the term involved.”