论文部分内容阅读
汉宋之分争,乃清学史一大议题。厘清汉学一词从无到有之发生,梳证汉学名义因人、因时、因事之演进、递变,则为原始要终、正本清源地认识汉宋问题之入手门径。江藩撰《汉学师承记》,旗帜鲜明地以汉学为名勾勒清代经学师承,突出强调了汉学在清学中之核心位置,引起同时及后世学人的不同反应,是重审汉学名义及《汉学师承记》旨趣之绝佳线索。以江藩所坚持之汉学名义为线索,可证学术史中汉学之称,最早专于《易》汉学与《易》王(弼)学之分别,后经惠栋承袭,加以阐释扩充,独树一帜,影响扩张,遂引发辨析争议。江藩坚执惠栋汉学之名义,不惜显露突兀的门户之见,以汉学通贯不能以汉学限之的清代经学与经师,实因应于戴震一系学人破惠氏汉学之举,并非有意与宋学相争为敌,乃意在为惠栋及其汉学争立学术之正宗与统系。
The dispute between Han and Song Dynasties is a major issue in the history of Qing studies. Clarifying the occurrence of sinology from scratch, combing the theory of sinology as a result of people, as a result of the evolution of things, change, then the original to the end, the original understanding of the Han and the Song Dynasty began a clear path. Jiang Fan wrote the book of Han scholar bearing the clear outline of the scholarly scholar of the Qing Dynasty in the name of Sinology, highlighting the central position of Sinology in the Qing studies and arousing different reactions of Scholars at the same time and later. It is a re-examination of Sinology’s name and Sinology Shiji remember "the best of clues. The clue of Jiang Han as the clue in the study of Sinology can prove that the earliest study of Sinology in the history of science is the distinction between the study of Yi (Yi) Sinology and Wang (Bute) in Yi, the inheritance of Hui Dong and its interpretation and expansion , Affecting the expansion, thus triggering discrimination analysis. Jiang Fan insisted that the name of Wai-Dong Sinology did not hesitate to reveal the obscure portal opinion, which could not be confined to Sinology by sinology. The reason should be that Daizhen, a scholar who broke Wyeth Sinology, did not intend to The struggle between the schools of Song and Song is an enemy, which aims to establish the authentic and systematic academic system of Huidong and its Sinology.