论文部分内容阅读
美国汉学家韩大伟是一位对西方汉学主义给予隐性颠覆与解构的中西比较经学研究者。在《孔子之口授注经考辨三则》一文中,他提出了“孔子口授注经”这个重要的中国经学诠释学命题。我建议使用“口传注经”这个命题以对“口授注经”取而代之,因为“口传注经”在汉字思维上更切近于中国经学诠释学的内在学理本质。《公羊传》与《穀梁传》的解经话语是语录体,是中国经学诠释学传统中“口传注经”的历史见证,而唐代经学家啖助也提出了《左传》为“口传注经”的问题。一部《春秋》在“三传”的理解与解释下,左氏、公羊氏与穀梁氏各立门户,师法与家法的分野导致《春秋》正是在三种不同的诠释学系统中越发佚失了文本的原初意义。释经从来就不是简单地对“五经”或《十三经》文本其汉字原初意义的还原性诠释,其关涉到历史的建构与解构、承继与颠覆的国族重大意识形态等问题。历史的本体只能是在场的言说,文字书写的历史从未以其符号的固定性记忆有效地拯救过主体在场言说意义的真值性,文字历史永远是被学者以种种书写欲盖弥彰的假象历史。
Han Daowei, a sinologist in the United States, is a comparative study of Chinese and western scholarship that implicitly subverts and deconstructs Western scholarism. In his article “Confucian Dictation Annotated Three Proofs,” he put forward the important Chinese hermeneutic hermeneutics proposition, “Confucius Dictation Annotations.” I suggest using the proposition “Oral Remarks” to replace “Oral Remarks ”, because “Oral Remarks ” in the Chinese thinking is closer to the intrinsic nature of the Chinese hermeneutic hermeneutics. The preaching scriptures of “Ramsong Biography” and “Gu Liangzhuan” are the quotations, which are the historical testimony of the “Oral Annotation of Confucian Classics” in the tradition of hermeneutics of the Confucian classics in Tang Dynasty, “For the” Oral Note “by the problem. An ”Spring and Autumn“ Under the understanding and interpretation of the ”Three Biography“, the division between Zuo Shou, Ram and Gu Liang’s clan, The Original Meaning of Lost Text in Hermeneutic Systems. Interpretation has never been simply a reductive interpretation of the original meaning of Chinese characters in the texts of the ”Five Classics“ or the ”Thirteen Classics", which are related to the construction and deconstruction of history and the major national ideology inherited and subverted. The ontology of history can only be the presence of words. The history of writing has never effectively saved the authenticity of the subject ’s presence and expression with the symbolic fixed memory. Literary history is forever the illusionary history of being buried by scholars in all kinds of writing.