论文部分内容阅读
在前人研究的基础上,本文考察了北京本(即北京故宫博物院藏,《石渠宝笈三编》著录本),认为此本有可能不是张择端原作。此外,还对文献资料中记载的一些《清明上河图》异本:南宋摹本、元内府藏似本、王振鹏临摹本、《书画传习录》本、张懋藏稿本、《弇州四部稿续稿》本、《味水轩日记》(即《牧斋初学集》)本、《铁网珊瑚》、《孙氏书画钞》、《式古堂书画汇考》、《十百斋书画录》、《书画所见录》、《有恒心斋集》等书著录本加以探讨,指出其中大多为明清以来的仿造本。
Based on the previous studies, this paper examines the original version of Beijing (the Beijing Palace Museum possession, “Shi Qu Baobian three series”), that this may not be the original Zhang Zeduan. In addition, some of the documents listed in the “Qingming Riverside” different versions: copy of the Southern Song Dynasty, Yuan Nei Fu possession of this copy of Wang Zhenpeng, “Calligraphy Biography”, Zhang Mao possession of manuscripts, “Danzhou four draft for the second ”This,“ Wei Shui Xuan diary ”(that is,“ the early learning set vegetarian ”),“ iron net coral ”,“ Sun notes and calligraphy ”,“ style ancient calligraphy and painting ”,“ The book of calligraphy and painting see ”,“ there is constant Zhai Ji ”and other books to be discussed in the book, pointing out that most of them are copied from the Ming and Qing Dynasties.