论文部分内容阅读
新古典经济增长模型将经济增长的原因归结为物质资本、人力资本和技术进步等因素,经济增长的差异来源于以上各要素积累的差异。然而,是什么造成了这些要素积累的差异?关注长期经济增长终因的研究试图回答这个问题,其中较具代表性的有地理假说和制度假说。目前国际学术界关于经济增长终因的研究过程基本上就是这两大假说的争论过程,双方均会在各自研究中对对方研究加以回应。本文通过对地理假说和制度假说相关理论观点的梳理,对两种假说之间的争论进行了较为全面的总结分析,并试图通过这种分析,将争论焦点细化为若干更为具体的研究问题,为长期经济增长终因的研究从“范式之争”向“问题之争”的转化提供参考。
The neoclassical economic growth model attributes economic growth to the factors of material capital, human capital and technological progress. The differences in economic growth come from the differences accumulated by the above factors. However, what caused the differences in the accumulation of these elements? The study focused on the ultimate cause of long-term economic growth attempted to answer this question. Among them, there are geographical hypotheses and institutional hypotheses. At present, the research process of the ultimate cause of economic growth in the international academic community is basically the process of debating these two major hypotheses. Both parties will respond to each other’s research in their own research. Through the combing of the related theories of geographical hypotheses and institutional hypotheses, this dissertation makes a comprehensive analysis of the controversies between the two hypotheses and tries to use this analysis to refine the debate into a few more specific research questions , For the study of the ultimate cause of long-term economic growth from the “paradigm ” “to the ” dispute "conversion provide a reference.