在资本主义国家里,资本主义制度决定了它社会生产的无政府状态和盲目性,根本谈不到编制全国统一的产品系列。但每一个公司和厂家,为了适应不同的需要,降低生产费用和提高产品质量,对产品系列化和通用化问题也给予了重视并做了一定的工作。其目的是掠取更大的利润。在我们社会主义国家里,为了降低生产成本、提高生产效率和产品质量,为国家节约人力物力,为革命多做贡献,更应该重视产品的标准化、系列化和通用化问题。毛主席教导我们:“对于外国文化,排外主义的方针是错误的,应当尽量吸收进步的外国文化,以为发展中国新文化的借镜;盲目搬用的方针也是错误的,应当以中国人民的实际需要为基础,批判地吸收外国文化”。本期选译了两篇系列化通用化方面的文章。希望读者有分析、有鉴别地参考。——本刊编者 In capitalist countries, the capitalist system determines the anarchy and blindness of its social production, and there is no point in formulating a nationally unified product line. However, each company and manufacturer, in order to meet different needs, reduce production costs and improve product quality, serialization and generalization of products have also paid attention to and do some work. Its purpose is to grab more profit. In our socialist countries, in order to reduce production costs, improve production efficiency and product quality, save manpower and material resources for the country, and make more contributions to the revolution, we should pay more attention to the standardization, serialization and universalization of products. Chairman Mao taught us: “For foreign cultures, the principle of xenophobia is wrong. We should try our best to absorb the progress of foreign cultures in order to learn from the development of a new Chinese culture. The principle of blind removal is also wrong. We should regard the actual needs of the Chinese people as Based on the critical absorption of foreign cultures. ” This issue has been translated into two series of generalized articles. I hope readers have analysis, a discriminatory reference. - Our editor