论文部分内容阅读
目的评价急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗用于急性心肌梗死患者治疗中的价值。方法选择60例急性心肌梗死患者作为治疗组,接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入方案治疗;同期再选择60例急性心肌梗死患者作为对照组,接受溶栓治疗。对两组患者临床效果进行对比。结果治疗组患者左室射血分数、左室舒张末期内径均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组住院时间及血管再通几率优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在急性心肌梗死患者治疗中推行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗方案效果突出,建议临床推广。
Objective To evaluate the value of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods Sixty patients with acute myocardial infarction were selected as the treatment group undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention. In the same period, 60 patients with acute myocardial infarction were selected as the control group and received thrombolytic therapy. The clinical effect of two groups of patients were compared. Results The left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in the treatment group were better than those in the control group (P <0.05). The hospitalization time and the rate of recanalization in the treatment group were better than those in the control group ). Conclusions In the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the implementation of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention has outstanding results, the proposed clinical promotion.