本文在梳理白银时代宗教哲学家对果戈理研究的同时,试图对其反思,与之对话。首先,本文认为批评家从宗教哲学角度阐释果戈理的生平及创作,显然准确捕捉了果戈理的主要特质,然而,对于果戈理的神秘性这一问题,依旧值得深入探析;第二,批评家解读了果戈理善恶观中形而上的普遍意义与普世价值,不过,笔者认为,果戈理在创作中也刻画出了人性之善以及善之可能;第三,批评家指出了果戈理的艺术创作中的实验性、立体性和象征性的特点,更多地阐析了果戈理创作中的非现实主义特征,丰富了对果戈理的研究成果。 This essay attempts to reflect on and discuss with Gogol in the silver philosophical era. First of all, this article argues that critics have interpreted Gogol’s life and creations from the perspective of religious philosophy. It clearly and accurately captures the main characteristics of Gogol. However, the mystery of Gogol still deserves in-depth exploration. The second , Critics interpret the metaphysical universal significance and universal values ​​in Gogol’s theory of good and evil. However, in my opinion, Gogol also depicts the goodness of human nature and the possibility of good in his creation. Thirdly, critics point out Gogol’s artistic creation in the experimental, three-dimensional and symbolic features, more analysis of Gogol’s creation of non-realistic features, enriching the fruit of Gogol’s research.