论文部分内容阅读
不论是在法学领域还是在文学领域,法律与正义之间的紧张关系一直都是一个备受关注的话题。最初将这一紧张关系呈现在人们眼前的也许可以说是索福克勒斯的悲剧《安提戈涅》。在这部戏剧中,女主人公安提戈涅安葬了国家法律明令禁止埋葬的叛军——她的弟弟。这一行为虽然违背国家法律,却符合人葬其亲的自然正义。如果她依据法律行为,反而有可能陷入不义的境地。在这一出戏剧中,法律与正义处于矛盾的状态,遵循法律反而不能获致正义。在现实生活中,这一矛盾的突出表现首推纳粹时期的法律。依据这些法律,犹太人的基本人权被悉数剥夺,“人得其应得”的基本正义原则被完全弃置。这些故
Tensions between law and justice have always been a topic of great concern, both in the field of law and in the field of literature. Perhaps the first tragedy of Sophocles, Antigone, to present this tension to the public. In this drama, the heroine Antigone has buried a rebel force, a brotherly nationality, that is forbidden to be buried under national law. Although this act runs counter to national law, it is in conformity with the natural justice of the person who has buried him. If she acts according to law, she may fall into injustice instead. In this drama, law and justice are in a state of contradiction, but law can not lead to justice. In real life, the prominent manifestation of this contradiction has been the law of the Nazi period. According to these laws, the basic human rights of the Jews are fully deprived, and the principle of “basic justice” of “the people deserve it” is completely abandoned. These are the reasons