论文部分内容阅读
我国古籍卷帙浩繁,经、史、子、集中皆不乏伪托现象,对画论的辨伪主要集中在画论专书中,如在明王绂《书画传习录》中就提及此前画论的真伪,但并无进一步说明。在《四库全书总目提要》中,清人对子部艺术类中的画论进行了简单考证,但多是从文学角度分析画论,而忽略了绘画本身。到近代,余绍宋在《书画书录解题》中辟专章对书论、画论中较著名的伪托之作进行了考证研究。俞剑华在《中国画论类编》中对梁元帝《山水松石
The great volume of ancient books in our country, the history, the children and the concentration are all lacking in the pseudo-trust phenomenon. The discrimination of painting theory mainly concentrates on the book of painting theory. For example, in Ming Wang 绂Pseudo, but no further explanation. In the “Outline of Sikuquanshu”, Qing dynasty makes a simple textual research on the painting theory in the sub-art category, but mostly analyzes the theory of painting from the perspective of literature while neglects the painting itself. In modern times, Yu Shaosong in the “calligraphy and writing problems” in the provision of special chapter of the book theory, painting theory of the more famous pseudo-care for research. Yu Jianhua in the “Chinese Painting Editorial” on the Emperor Liang Yuan "landscape turquoise