论文部分内容阅读
本文对“汉代今、古文学派对孔子与‘六经’关系的认识分歧”和“汉代经学中的齐、鲁之学与今、古文经学的关系”这两个问题进行了较为深入、客观的考察、论述和辨正。一方面证明:汉代今文经学和古文经学都认为孔子曾对六经进行过加工整理,都承认除了《春秋》和《易传》之外,其他经书都是孔子之前就已存在的古代文献,只是经孔子加工整理和传承而已。双方对这个问题的认识并非如廖平、康有为、周予同等学者所说的那样截然对立,壁垒分明。另一方面证明:汉代今文经学与古文经学中均既有齐学,也有鲁学;同时,齐学与鲁学中也都既有今文经学,也有古文经学。从而论定范文澜先生“今、古文之争,实际上是齐、鲁之争”的说法并不符合历史实际。
The dissertation makes a comparative study on the two problems of “the differences between the Han Dynasty and the ancient literature school on the relationship between Confucius and the Sixth Classics” and “the relationship between Qi, Lu studies and ancient Chinese classics in the Han Dynasty” In-depth, objective investigation, discussion and identification. On the one hand, it proves that both the Han text classics and the ancient classics classics think that Confucius once processed and processed the Six Classics, both acknowledged that except the Spring and Autumn Annals and Yi Zhuan, the other classics are all ancient documents that existed before Confucius, Only by Confucius processing and inheritance only. The understanding on this issue between the two sides is not as diametrically opposed as that put forth by scholars like Liao Ping, Kang Youwei and Zhou Yushi and other scholars, and the barriers are clear. On the other hand, it is proved that both modern classics and ancient classics in the Han Dynasty both have both Qi and Lu learning. In the meanwhile, both modern and modern Chinese classics also have ancient classics and classical Chinese classics. Therefore, it is not in line with the historical fact that the argument of Mr. Fan Wenlan “This ancient controversy is actually Qi and Lu ”.