论文部分内容阅读
孙康宜、宇文所安主编的《剑桥中国文学史》,阵容豪华,新意迭出,是近年来影响广泛的著述之一,其中林顺夫执笔的南宋部分、伊维德执笔的说唱文学部分等章节,尤为我所偏爱。但本文的目的不是就其长处加以讨论,而是就其楚辞论述与之展开商榷。由于《剑桥中国文学史》这一部分的执笔者是美国普林斯顿大学东亚研究教授柯马丁(Martin Kern),所以行文时多用柯马丁代替《剑桥中国文学史》,以求简洁。
One of the most influential writings in recent years is Sun Kangyi and “The History of Chinese Literary History of Cambridge”, edited by Yu Wenan. Among them, the section of the Southern Song Dynasty written by Lin Shunfu and the part of rap literature written by Yvide are especially my The preference. But the purpose of this article is not to discuss its strengths, but rather to discuss its Chu language. As the author of “Cambridge History of Chinese Literature” was written by Martin Kern, a professor of East Asian studies at Princeton University in the United States, it is often used instead of “History of Chinese Literary History of Cambridge” in writing for concision.