论文部分内容阅读
在环境污染侵权、生态破坏侵权、“生态损害”事件频发的情况下,侵权责任法还以传统的以环境污染侵权为立法的全部内容,受到跨部门法和司法实践的挑战,为此,对侵权责任法中的环境污染侵权进行立法评析尤为重要。侵权责任法对环境污染侵权立法缺陷在于,保护对象上的局限、救济方式上的“一刀切”以及保障制度缺失,同时,侵权责任法对生态破坏侵权、“生态损害”出现立法的空白。因此,侵权责任法需要增设生态破坏侵权类型以扩大保护对象的范围,需要对救济方式进行“区别化”和增设保障制度以补偿和保护受害人,同时认为需要增设新的章节以要求侵害人对“生态损害”承担责任。
Under the circumstances of environmental pollution infringement, ecological damage infringement and “ecological damage ” incident, the Tort Liability Law also takes the traditional environmental pollution infringement as the entire content of the legislation, which is challenged by the cross-sectoral law and judicial practice. Therefore, it is very important to conduct the legislative appraisal on the environmental pollution infringement in Tort Liability Law. Tort law of liability for environmental pollution infringement lies in the legislative limitations of the object of protection, relief methods on the “one size fits all” and the lack of security system, at the same time, tort liability law on ecological damage infringement, “ecological damage ” appear legislation blank. Therefore, the Tort Liability Act needs to add the type of ecological destruction infringement to expand the scope of the object of protection. It needs to “differentiate” the relief method and provide additional safeguards to compensate and protect the victims. At the same time, it is considered that new sections need to be added to claim infringement People assume responsibility for “ecological damage”.