通过对谷歌扫描案在中美两国不同判决的对比,发现中美两国的网络著作权合理使用制度的具体规定存在许多不同之处,美国采取的是四要素法,中国采取例举式立法模式,分析中美的各自立法的优缺点,找到更加适合我国著作权法合理使用制度判断标准。与此同时,我们要明确两者追求的法律价值目标是一致的,即促进社会的科学文化发展,实现版权的最终目标。 By comparing the different cases of Google scanning in China and the United States, it is found that there are many differences between the specific provisions of the system of fair use of online copyrights in China and the United States. The United States adopts the four-factor law and China adopts an exemplary legislative model , Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the respective legislation of China and the United States, and find the more suitable standard of judging the reasonable use of copyright law in our country. At the same time, we must make clear that the legal values ​​pursued by the two are consistent, that is, to promote the scientific and cultural development of society and achieve the ultimate goal of copyright.