论文部分内容阅读
近年来,当事人主义法域的新闻记者、政策制定者与学者对职权主义的性质展开了激烈辩论。英国争论之政治影响多半源自不时由某些政要所提出的这样一个主张——对警察的侦查进行某种监督——应当将法国那样的制度引进英格兰和威尔士。2当遭到质疑的对象不仅仅是特定的规则,而且还包括我们当事人主义制度的根据时,这种主张就会出现。因此,在1991年,冤案昭雪之后,组建了刑事司法委员会,审前程序中的当事人主义制度成了争论的焦
In recent years, journalists, policy makers and academics in the jurisprudential jurisprudence have fiercely debated the nature of official doctrine. The political effects of the controversy in the United Kingdom stemmed mostly from the suggestion made by some politicians, from time to time, that some sort of oversight of police investigations - that France should be introduced into England and Wales. 2 Such assertions arise when the object being questioned is not merely a specific rule, but also the basis of our institutionalist system. Therefore, after the injustice in 1991, the criminal justice commission was formed and the doctrine of parties in pre-trial proceedings became the focus of controversy