有一人家遭到抢劫,警方抓到两个犯罪嫌疑人:某甲、某乙。警方将甲乙两人隔离审讯,对某甲说:如果你坦白罪行而某乙不交代,那么你无罪释放,某乙判刑5年刑;如果你拒不坦白,而被某乙检举,那么你就将被判5年刑,而某乙无罪释放;如果你们两人都坦白交代,半斤八两,那就都要各判3年刑;如果两人都拒绝坦白交代,查无实据,那也要各判1年。同样的话也对某乙讲了一遍。某甲和某乙陷入两难境地:坦白?还是抵赖? 开始的策略推理是,最佳策略是双 One person was robbed and the police arrested two suspects: one A and one B. If you confessed a crime and you did not account for it, then you are acquitted and you are sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. If you refuse to confess that you are being prosecuted by a police officer, then you He will be sentenced to 5 years ’imprisonment while one of B will be acquitted. If both of you confidentially confiscate each case, you will have to sentence 3 years’ imprisonment. If neither of you refuses to confess, Each sentence for 1 year. The same thing is also said about a second. A and B into a dilemma: frankly or non-repudiation? The strategic reasoning is that the best strategy is to double