论文部分内容阅读
在当下中国转型时期,司法中对于“良法”的追求,实际上是在探寻如何完善立法的问题。形式主导型立法与功能主导型立法,两者在思想渊源、立法形式、认识论与价值论以及对后期法学影响等方面均存在差异,但受时代的影响,现代国家立法正发生着实用主义转型,基于人权保护和制约公权的需要,逐步从侧重完善法律形式转向兼顾法的适用功能,从单纯注重立法的形式规范性特征向注重立法的实质正义与社会需求转变。这种实用主义的立法思潮对中国的法治转型产生了积极影响,推动了立法对人权的保护、对民间法入法的重视以及立法方法论自身的发展。
In the current period of China’s transition, the quest for “goodwill” in the judiciary is actually seeking ways to improve the legislation. There is a difference between the form-based legislation and the function-based legislation. Both of them have differences in the origin of ideas, the form of legislation, the epistemology and the theory of value, and the impact on the later jurisprudence. However, under the influence of the times, the modern state legislations are undergoing pragmatic transformation. Based on the need of human rights protection and restriction of public power, we gradually shift from focusing on perfecting the legal form to balancing the applicable functions of the law, from focusing solely on the formal normative features of legislation to focusing on substantive justice of legislation and changes in social needs. This kind of pragmatic legislative trend had a positive impact on the transformation of the rule of law in China, promoted the protection of human rights by legislation, emphasized the incorporation of non-governmental laws and the development of legislative methodology itself.