记者:近读您所主编的《二十世纪中国文学史》,颇有些新异而厚重之感。作为一部专门史,我觉得它在对对象范围的界定和历史分期上都明显地与众不同。您能对此做些解释吗?孔范今:当然可以。我想,对这个问题可以先从现当代文学研究特别是治史中的问题谈起。多年以来,以政治革命史律定甚至取代文学史、以政治标准取代文学标准的主导性制控,严重地戕害甚至是窒息了文学研究和文学 Reporter: Having read the “History of Chinese Literature of the Twentieth Century” edited by you, there are quite a few new and different meanings. As a specialized history, I think it clearly distinguishes itself in defining the scope of the object and in the historical staging. Can you explain this? Kong Fanjin: Of course. I think this issue can be talked about from the perspective of modern and contemporary literary studies, especially in the history of the government. Over the years, the law of political revolution has replaced or even overturned the history of literature, replacing the dominant standards of literature with political standards, seriously damaging or even suffocating literary studies and literature