论文部分内容阅读
2003年颁布的《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》中对死亡赔偿金进行规定,社会大众对“同命不同价”议论纷纷。死亡赔偿金不是对死者本人的赔偿,而是对死者近亲属的一种精神抚慰和财产损失赔偿。城乡二元结构的划分在一定程度上体现不平等,但差别是一定存在的,是对平等的一种修正,只有形式上的平等和实质上的平等相统一才能达到真正意义上的平等。明确死亡赔偿金的性质、完善侵权损害赔偿是当务之急。
The “Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Compensation Cases for Personal Injury Compensation” promulgated in 2003 stipulates the amount of compensation for death, and the public has a lot of arguments about “different prices at the same life”. Death compensation is not compensation for the deceased himself, but a kind of spiritual comfort and property damage compensation for the close relatives of the deceased. The division of urban-rural dual structure reflects inequality to some extent, but the difference is bound to exist. It is a revision of equality. Only formal equality and substantive equality can achieve the true equality. Clear the nature of death compensation, improve the compensation for damages is a top priority.