我们崇尚的世界观是一元论的,但在同一世界观的指导下,却不赞成在观察文学现象、分析文学作品时只取某种单一的批评模式。既然作为人类崇高的精神产品之一的文学创作是有生命的伟大整体,那么,针对不同的对象,其审视方法、研究途经和批评角度,可以是多种多样的,正如班固所说“道混成而自然兮,求同源而分流”(《幽通赋》)的道理那样。不过,回头来考察一下我们比较流行的某些文学评论。其思维方式是值得研究的。这类批评性文字,力图忠实于文学是社会生活的反映的原则,但走上了“还原法”的路子。在批评实践中,往往从单称陈述(个别)引出全称陈述(一般)的结论,或用平面的观察陈述确认某个理论命题的真伪。例如 The world view we advocate is monistic, but under the guidance of the same world outlook, we are not in favor of adopting only a single mode of criticism in observing literary phenomena and analyzing literary works. Since literary creation, one of the lofty spiritual products of mankind, is a great whole with life, then the method of study, study, and criticism for different objects can be varied. As Baogu said, And natural Xi, seeking the same source and diversion “(” You Tong Fu “) as the truth. However, go back and review some of our more popular literary reviews. Its way of thinking is worth studying. This kind of critical text, trying to be faithful to literature, is a principle reflected in social life, but it has embarked on the path of ”restoration law." In the practice of criticism, the conclusion of the full statement (in general) is often derived from the singular statement (individual), or the authenticity of a theoretical proposition is confirmed by a flat observation statement. E.g