我给了今天的演讲这样一个题目:“平等的方法”。这题目听上去怪怪的。大家不会认为平等是一种方法。大家会认为,平等要么是一个事实——一种有效的关系一一要么是一个观念。而方法,大家会认为,应该是一个程序的集合,通过这些程序,会产生某种效果,或会产生一条道路,我们不得不沿着它去获得一种新知识或新技巧。基于此,思考方法与平等的关系时,我们会采取两种正常的方法。第一种方法,在于我们说,一种方法不应该专门针对那些关于平等和不平等的问题。它只针对 I gave a speech on today such a topic: “equal method ”. This topic sounds weird. We do not think equality is a way. You will think that equality is either a fact - an effective relationship - or a concept. The method, you will think, should be a collection of procedures, through these procedures, will produce some effect, or there will be a way, we have to go along with it to get a new knowledge or new skills. Based on this, we will take two normal approaches when we think about the relationship between method and equality. The first is that we say that one approach should not be specific to those questions about equality and inequality. It is only for