有机无机理论之争的背后是油气田勘探方向和开发方案之争。而“代替”是由技术进步程度决定的,也是一个自然的渐进过程,选择启动这个过程就是个十分艰难的科学问题。笔者与朋友闲聊时有感而成的——《替代燃油汽车又一个世纪骗局?》一文刊登在本刊9月5日一期上。该文是用实证信息说明不要因原油稀缺理论就去替代燃油汽车(而非全方面论证),那样做不经济且还会形成新的污染。同时 Behind the controversy over organic-inorganic theory is the dispute over the exploration direction and development plan of oil and gas fields. The “instead of” is determined by the degree of technological progress, but also a natural gradual process, choose to start this process is a very difficult scientific problem. When I chatted with my friends, I became convinced - “Another century of alternative fuel vehicles scam?” One article published in September 5 issue of a period. The paper is based on empirical evidence that it should not be a substitute for a fuel-efficient car (rather than an all-encompassing argument) due to the theory of crude oil scarcity, which can be uneconomical and create new levels of pollution. Simultaneously