论文部分内容阅读
中华法系从法统的外在结构上是一个“礼法”法系。在中华法系解体之后的民初,“礼”依然存续于司法实践中。大理院对“礼”的适用方式有二种,第一为忠实地遵守贯彻“礼”的精神、观念或制度;第二从语词和观念等层面对“礼”进行间接转换。“礼”在大理院民事裁判中承载着寻绎立法意旨的和诠释法理念两个方面的功能。大理院在司法中一方面积极带来新法理,同时又顾及“礼”所代表的传统中国义理和伦理道德规范。在强硬主导改变和尊重人民认同的习惯和传统之间,大理院的地位、作为,值得后人再省思。
The Chinese legal system is an “etiquette ” legal system from the external structure of the system of law. After the dissolution of the Chinese legal system in the early Republic of China, “rites ” still persisted in judicial practice. There are two ways that Daliyuan can apply to “ceremony”. The first is to abide faithfully in the spirit, concept or system of “ceremony.” The second is to direct “rites” from the perspective of words and concepts Conversion. “Ceremony ” carries the function of seeking two aspects of legislative idea and interpretation law in Daliyuan civil referendum. On the one hand, Daliyuan is actively bringing new jurisprudence in the judiciary while taking into consideration the traditional Chinese norms and ethics as represented by “Ceremony”. Between the habits and traditions that led the change and the respect of the people’s identity in a tough manner, the position and act of the Daliyuan deserve further reflection.