1.本文不是通过材料归纳句型,而是试图从假设出发,解释施事宾语句的主要类型,碰巧还能发现一些新材料和新类型。 施事作宾语,不是动宾语义序列的常例。吕叔湘先生(1946)指出:“拿施事作主语、受事作宾语,是有很坚强的心理依据的”,“把受事提前,把施事退后,都不仅仅是修辞性的变化;应用这种句式有种种条件,而具备这种条件时,这种词序竟是强迫性的或半强迫性的。”值得注意的是吕先生这里指出的句式的强迫性,那末,这强迫性的条件是什么呢?吕文在谈到施事居后的句子 1. Instead of summarizing the sentence patterns by material, we try to explain the main types of hand-set statements from the assumption that some new materials and new types happen to be discovered by chance. The act as an object, not a verb-object semantic sequence of the usual example. Mr. Lv Shuxiang (1946) pointed out: “It is a very strong psychological basis for Narada to serve as the subject and take the subject as the object.” “Adopting the affair in advance and returning the affair to service are not merely rhetorical changes; There are various kinds of conditions for the application of this sentence pattern, and when such conditions are present, the phrase order is actually obsessive or semi-obsessional. ”Of note is the compulsion of the sentence style pointed out by Mr. Lv here, What is the condition of sex? Lv Wen talked about the post-mortem sentence