论文部分内容阅读
哈特是新分析实证主义法学的代表人物,其创立的以法律规则论为核心的实证主义法学在法理学界占有极为重要的地位。长期以来,我国法理学界多是基于民法法系制定法传统去研究哈特法理学,忽视了哈特法理学诞生的普通法法系判例法的背景,因此在一定程度上误读了哈特的学说。哈特的法律规则论实际上是对普通法产生、发展、运作进行分析和论述而得到的产物,其“规则”概念所指向的对象迥异于民法法系中“法律规则”这一概念所指向的对象,而是指普通法的法律发现和法律论证过程。厘清哈特学说的真正对象,才有可能恰当地理解哈特的学说。
Hart is the representative of the new analytical positivist jurisprudence. The positivist jurisprudence which is founded on the rule of law, occupies a very important position in jurisprudence jurisprudence. For a long time, most jurisprudence in our country is based on the tradition of statutory law of civil law to study Hart jurisprudence, ignoring the background of jurisprudence of common law law which gave birth to Hart jurisprudence. Therefore, to a certain extent, theory. Hart’s rule of law is actually a product of analysis and discussion of the common law’s production, development and operation. The object of his “rule” concept is very different from that of civil law law A concept refers to the object, but refers to the common law legal discovery and legal argument process. It is possible to understand Hart’s theory properly by clarifying the real object of Hart’s theory.