专业志要不要“因事系人”?目前在修志者中存在着不同的看法。一种看法认为,新志设有专载人物的专志、专篇或专章,记事门类不必“因事系人”。另一种看法认为,各行各业的兴衰起伏,无不是以人为中心的活动,因此,记述一方事业、行业的专业志,必须“因事系人”,把人物的活动贯穿于全志的各个门类之中。还有的虽然在认识上同意要“因事系人”,但碰到一些棘手的问题,诸如“因事系人”系谁,标准难定;所系人物引起争议,官司难打;所系人物今后出事,责任难当等等,于是绕道而行,这也是“因事系人”薄弱的直接原因。 Professional Chi want to “people because of things”? There are different views among the practitioners. A view that the new blog with dedicated people’s special, monographs or monographs, memo categories do not have to “because of the person.” Another view is that the ups and downs of all walks of life are all people-centered activities. Therefore, when describing the professionalism of one undertaking or profession, it is necessary to “carry out the activities of people through all causes” Among the categories. There are still some problems in understanding, such as “who is the cause of the problem,” and the standards are hard to come by; the people involved are controversial and the lawsuits are hard to beat; Characters in the future accidents, responsibilities such as difficult to wait, then detour, this is also the direct cause of the weakness of “due to people.”