论土地征收中公共利益的立法界定

来源 :私法研究 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:xxj8880430
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目次一、土地征收应以增进公共利益为要件二、立法者应作必要的价值判断三、公共利益有予以界定的必要四、公共利益有予以界定的可能五、从公私益关系出发界定土地征收中的公共利益六、土地征收中公益事业的类型化在土地征收中,是否应该以增进公共利益为必要前提?如果是,什么是公共利益(有时为与“私益”相对,简称“公益”)?法律要不要界定公共利益、能不能界定公共利益?如果能,又如何界定公共利益?法学界对这些问题可谓众说纷纭,至今未 Second, the legislator should make the necessary judgments of value Third, the public interest is necessary to define Fourth, the public interest may be defined Five possible, from the public-private relations defined the land acquisition In the public interest Sixth, the type of land in the collection of public welfare in the land expropriation, whether it should be to promote the public interest as a necessary prerequisite? If so, what is the public interest (sometimes with the “private benefit” relative, referred to as “ Public interest ”)? Law should not define the public interest, can define the public interest? If so, how to define the public interest? The law circles can be described as diverse opinions on these issues, so far
其他文献
一、引言rn坦率地讲,对我国试用期制度展开质疑与批判的,笔者并非“第一人”.早在1994年《劳动法》颁行之初,即已有人对其第21条[1]的设置提出了批评之声.[2]随之而来的回应,
期刊
期刊
期刊
期刊
期刊