论文部分内容阅读
Sn(OH)4 was prepared by the conventional solution precipitate method,followed by supercritical CO2 drying.The resultant Sn(OH)4 was divided into three aliquots and calcined at 400,600 and 800 °C,respectively,thus SnO2 nanoparticles with average crystallite sizes of 5,10 and 25 nm were obtained.Furthermore,three SnO2 thick film gas sensors(denoted as sensors S-400,S-600 and S-800) were fabricated from the above SnO2 nanoparticles.The adhesion of sensing materials on the surface of alumina tube is good.Compared to the sensors S-600 and S-800,sensor S-400 showed a much higher sensitivity to 1000 μL/L ethanol.On the other hand,sensor S-800 showed a much lower intrinsic resistance and improved selectivity to ethanol than sensors S-400 and S-600.X-Ray diffraction(XRD),transmission electron microscopy(TEM) and selective area electron diffraction(SAED) measurements were used to characterize the SnO2 nanoparticles calcined at different temperatures.The differences in the gas sensing performance of these sensors were analyzed on the basis of scanning electron microscopy(SEM).
Sn (OH) 4 was prepared by the conventional solution precipitation method, followed by supercritical CO2 drying. The resultant Sn (OH) 4 was divided into three aliquots and calcined at 400,600 and 800 ° C, respectively, thus SnO2 nanoparticles with average crystallite sizes of 5, 10 and 25 nm were obtained. Durthermore, three SnO2 thick film gas sensors (denoted as S-400, S-600 and S-800) were fabricated from above SnO2 nanoparticles. adhesion of sensing materials on the surface of alumina tube is good. Compared to the sensors S-600 and S-800, sensor S-400 showed a much higher sensitivity to 1000 μL / L ethanol.On the other hand, sensor S-800 showed a much lower intrinsic resistance and Improved selectivity to ethanol than sensors S-400 and S-600. X-Ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and selective area electron diffraction (SAED) measurements were used to characterize the SnO2 nanoparticles calcined at different temperatures. differences in the gas sensing performan ce of these sensors were analyzed on the basis of scanning electron microscopy (SEM).