论文部分内容阅读
关于农民战争是不是封建社会发展的动力问题,史学界至今仍有争议。本文以中西比较的形式论证了毛泽东农民战争动力论的科学性。指出,农民战争动力论是毛泽东对历史唯物主义的新发展,它使人民群众是历史的真正创造者这个基本命题更加完善;无论在中国还是西欧,农民战争都直接或间接地推动了生产力的进步和社会经济的发展。中国农民战争的动力比西欧大,但由于阻力也比西欧大,实际动力反而比西欧小,加之它缺乏新的革命因素的诱导,没有市民阶级斗争相配合,能引起社会发生质变的机会就小,所以中国社会发展反而比西欧慢。我们决不能因此否定农民战争动力论的科学性。
On the peasant war is not the driving force of the development of feudal society, historians still controversial. This article demonstrates the scientific nature of Mao Zedong’s peasant-war theory of motivation based on the comparison between Chinese and Western cultures. Pointed out that the motive force of peasant war was a new development of historical materialism by Mao Zedong and the basic proposition of making the masses of people the true creator of history was more perfect. The peasant wars both directly and indirectly promoted the improvement of productive forces in both China and Western Europe And social and economic development. The peasant war in China was more motivated than in western Europe. However, its resistance was larger than in Western Europe, its actual power was smaller than in Western Europe, and its lack of induction by a new revolutionary element led to a small chance of causing a qualitative change in the society without the coordination of the people’s class struggle , So China’s social development is slower than Western Europe. We must not therefore deny the scientific nature of the peasant war impetus.