论文部分内容阅读
科研工作相对比较稳定,算得上铁饭碗。但求真务实是科研的真谛,对科研工作者的诚信要求理应更高。在美国,科研中的行为不端现象一旦暴露,当事人一辈子都难再吃上科研饭。美国学术界对何为科研行为不端基本没有歧义。首先立下共同的规矩,才能堵住狡辩的嘴巴,让当事人没法死不认账。例如,引用别人的研究成果就需要用引号标记,明确注明出处,否则就会被认定是抄袭,这种教育从中小学就开始,谁要想诡辩称引用不当或疏忽来蒙混过关是不可能的。
Scientific research is relatively stable, can be considered on the iron rice bowl. However, seeking truth and being pragmatic is the essence of scientific research, and the credit requirements of scientific researchers should be even higher. In the United States, once exposed the misconduct in scientific research, the parties are hard to eat scientific research rice. The academic circles in the United States have basically no disagreement on what is the misconduct in scientific research. First set a common rule, in order to block the sophistry of the mouth, so that the parties can not die does not admit. For example, quoting others' research results requires the use of quotation marks to clearly indicate the source, otherwise it will be considered a plagiarism. This education starts with primary and secondary schools. It is impossible for anyone who wants to make sophistical arguments that misreads or negligence do not cross the boundary .