近年来,虽然关于应如何平衡我国“新闻监督与司法公正”这对矛盾早已被学者们反复论及,但传统的研究方式尚需改进。通过对英国、美国和加拿大三国的比较法研究,一个新的研究思路被提出,它指出过去传统的研究路径———单纯地寄希望于移植某一国(或某一法系)的法,事实上无助于真正解决中国自己的问题。任何一个国家的法律制度都与其社会文化、法律传统等因素紧密相连,并没有放之四海皆准的所谓的国际标准。只有真正理解了这种复杂的关联,并结合中国自己的实际情况,才可能发展出真正适合中国的制度。 In recent years, although the contradiction between how to balance China’s “news supervision and judicial fairness” has long been repeatedly discussed by scholars, the traditional research methods still need to be improved. A new research idea has been put forward through comparative law research on Britain, the United States and Canada. It points out that the past traditional research methods, which simply pinned on the law of transplanting a certain country (or a legal system) In fact it will not help to really solve China’s own problems. The legal system of any country is closely linked with its social culture, legal tradition and other factors. It does not have so-called international standards that are universally applicable. Only by really understanding this complicated relationship and by combining with China’s own actual conditions will it be possible to develop a system that really suits China.