本文由学术期刊评价体系着笔,到评价指标体系构建,再到具体的评价指标设置,是一个由宏观到微观的过程,目的在于从宏观角度对微观的具体评价指标有一个正确的了解和认识。通过对现行评价体系尤其是法学学术期刊评价体系现状的分析,提出从原理或假设、样本选取、指标设置、指标间关系、结果及其验证、结论判读六个方面构建学术期刊评价指标体系,进而提出构建以功能为基点的期刊评价指标,并将学术期刊评价分成期刊、学术期刊、学科学术期刊三个层次设置、选取评价指标,以期获得使用者的认同。 This article is written by the evaluation system of academic journals to the construction of evaluation index system and then to the specific evaluation index setting. It is a process from macroscopic to microcosmic. The purpose is to have a correct understanding and understanding of the microcosmic specific evaluation indexes from a macroscopic perspective. Based on the analysis of the current evaluation system, especially the status quo of legal academic journals evaluation system, this paper proposes that the evaluation index system of academic journals should be constructed from six aspects: principle or hypothesis, sample selection, index setting, the relationship between indicators, results and their verification, and conclusions It puts forward to set up evaluation index of journals based on function, and divide journals evaluation into journals, academic periodicals and academic journals at three levels to select evaluation index so as to obtain user’s approval.