论文部分内容阅读
近几年来,“回到马克思”、“走近马克思”、“重读马克思”等提法不时见诸报端,有关这方面的新著不断问世,但也出现了一些值得注意的情况。如有的同志在读解马克思哲学时得出马克思不承认有客观的物质世界存在,不承认有普遍的客观规律。也有的同志用西方哲学来读解马克思,得出回到康德的“抛弃知识,为信仰开拓地盘”的结论。还有的同志在诠释马克思哲学时认为马克思从未提出过历史唯物主义以外的其他任何哲学,辩证唯物主义是恩格斯误读马克思的产物。这就有一个如何读解马克思的问题。我不赞成“回到马克思”的提法。我认为,在当前读解马克思时至少要注意以下三点。
In recent years, references such as “Back to Marx”, “Approaching Marx” and “Re-reading Marx” have appeared in newspapers and newspapers. The new book on this issue has come forth incessantly, but some noteworthy situations have also emerged. When some comrades read Marx’s philosophy, they came to the conclusion that Marx did not recognize the existence of an objective material world and did not recognize the universal objective laws. Some comrades used Marxist philosophy to understand Marx and came to Kant’s conclusion that “abandoning knowledge and opening up a site for faith”. Some comrades in interpreting Marx’s philosophy think that Marx never proposed any philosophy other than historical materialism. Dialectical materialism is the product of Marx’s misreading of Marx by Engels. Here is a question on how to read Marx. I disagree with the reference to “return to Marx.” In my opinion, at least the following three points must be observed when reading Marx.