论文部分内容阅读
盗窃犯罪作为典型的侵财类犯罪,在我们刑事司法实践中系高发、多发型犯罪。2011年5月1日起正式实施的《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(八)》对盗窃犯罪进行了重新界定,其中“入户盗窃”作为非数额型盗窃犯罪典型,其客观行为模式以“入户+盗窃”构成,其侵害的法益由单纯财产权益扩张为包括财产权益、生活安宁、人身安全等多种关系,因而其定罪标准不再以“数额较大”为限。这种变化,导致“入户盗窃”具有一定行为犯色彩,而给其着手、既遂的认定带来一定困难。本文将从“入户盗窃”的立法沿革、行为形态的实践认定、存在的缺陷及完善建议等几方面对入户盗窃的适用进行初步研究。
As a Typical Crime of Invasion of Crime, Theft Crime is a High-crime, Multiple-type Crime in Our Criminal Justice Practice. The Criminal Code Amendment (8), put into effect on May 1, 2011, redefined the crime of theft, in which “household burglary ” is typical of the crime of non-type theft and its objective behavior model “Household + theft ” constitutes the law of infringement from the simple expansion of the property rights to include property rights and interests, peace of life, personal safety and other relationships, and therefore its conviction is no longer a “larger” . This change, resulting in “home burglary ” has committed a certain act of guilty of color, and to its start, the identification of the attempt to bring some difficulties. This article will make a preliminary study on the application of home theft from several aspects, such as the legislative evolution of “household theft”, the practice of behavioral forms, the existing defects and the suggestions of perfection.