古远清教授在论文中对台湾诗坛提出许多中肯论点,但也存在许多不恰切的表述,如以蓝绿二分法平分台湾现代诗坛有些武断,用蓝天绿地“笼罩”或“对峙”语不够恰当,认为台湾的诗人会受政治的“操控”也过于绝对。古教授关爱台湾诗坛的热心令人感佩,但是隔岸观火,难免失真;隔岸传真,难免模糊。台湾蓝绿的诗人多少受政治气候与环境的牵引,但完全是诗人主观意识的抒发,无形中形成蓝绿对立观点的看法而已。 In his thesis, Professor Yuanyuan Yuan put forward many pertinence points in Taiwan’s poetry circles, but there are also many inappropriate expressions. For example, using blue-green dichotomy to divide Taiwan’s modern poetic circles somewhat arbitrarily, confrontation with blue sky, “Language is not appropriate enough, that the poet in Taiwan will be political ” control "is too absolute. Professor Koo appreciates the enthusiasm of Taiwanese poetry, but it is hard to avoid distortions; Taiwan’s blue-green poets are somewhat drawn by the political climate and the environment, but they are entirely the expression of poet’s subjective consciousness, virtually forming the viewpoint of blue-green opposition.