论文部分内容阅读
不管是作为个体,还是作为一个群体,今天的我们都生活在这样一个处境之中:不得不与来自各种不同文化世界的陌生人打交道。在这一处境下,多元原则被当作一条正当的原则。但是,多元原则本身的正当性理由何在?这一原则是否有界限?如果有,这一界限在哪里?如果说这些是今天的哲学与人文科学不得不面对的问题,那么也意味着哲学不得不重新面对自由问题。因为不仅正是自由使文化与历史成为可能,而且也是自由构成了文化多元化的根基。不仅如此,在今天的处境下,如果要能够自主、自觉地参与由现代化带来的全球化,并进而对此加以反思、引导,那么,我们首先需要面对古希腊文化经典与近代启蒙思想经典,因为前者确立了科学,后者确立了现代社会的基本原则。
Whether as individuals or as a group, we all today live in a situation where we have to deal with strangers from different cultural worlds. In this situation, the principle of pluralism is treated as a just principle. But what is the justification for the principle of pluralism? Is there a boundary between this principle? If so, where is the boundary? If these are the problems that the philosophy and humanities of today have to deal with, it also means that philosophy can not Do not face freedom again. Because it is not only freedom that makes culture and history possible, but also the freedom to form the foundation of cultural diversity. Not only that, in today’s situation, if we are to be able to participate autonomously and voluntarily in the globalization brought by modernization and then reflect on and guide it, then we first need to face the classic classics of ancient Greek culture and modern enlightenment Because the former established science and the latter established the basic principles of modern society.