对于请多位外审专家进行审稿的学术期刊，让专家的审稿意见和编辑的意见在该稿件的评审专家之间共享及择优将审稿意见及作者的答复在刊物或刊物网站上公开发表，称为审稿意见的深度利用。认为审稿意见的深度利用可促进学术交流、树立期刊形象、提高专家的审稿积极性和审稿水平，并有助于提高编辑的初审能力。列举了审稿意见深度利用时的注意事项。“,”For sci-tech periodicals that invite two or more peer reviewers for one paper, the comments of reviewers and the answers of the authors can be shared among the reviewers of the paper or be published in the periodicals or at the periodical websites, which can be called the deep utilization of peer review comments. It is proposed that the deep utilization of peer review comments can encourage academic exchanges, establish a good image of the periodical, arouse the enthusiasms of peer reviewers and improve their review levels, and is helpful in improving the initial evaluation levels of editors. Some aspects that need attention in actual work are also pointed out.