论文部分内容阅读
为了重点打击国家工作人员的腐败行为,我国《刑法》对贿赂犯罪中的行贿人给予了“有条件从轻处理”的立法待遇。在司法实践当中,也形成了“重查受贿、轻办行贿”的办案格局,然而这一办案格局从长远来看不利于有效打击贿赂犯罪,而且司法实践中对行贿人的处理方式也极不规范,难以纳入侦查监督的视野,与现代刑事诉讼法律理念相悖。本文主要从有效打击贿赂腐败犯罪的角度出发,对行受贿犯罪中行贿人的处理方式进行探讨,并认为将实践中对行贿人的司法处理从程序法角度加以规范应是立法改进的方向,而进而明确给予行贿人以“污点证人”的刑事诉讼地位则是一个合理的选择。
In order to focus on cracking down on corrupt activities of state staff, the Criminal Law of our country has given “conditional and lenient treatment” to bribery in bribery crimes. In the judicial practice, it also formed a “review of bribery, bribery” handling the case pattern, but the handling of the case in the long run is not conducive to effectively combat bribery, and judicial practice of bribery in the way Very non-standard, it is difficult to integrate into the field of investigation and supervision, contrary to the concept of modern criminal proceedings. This article mainly discusses how to deal with bribery in the crime of accepting bribes in order to effectively combat the crime of bribery corruption and holds that it should be the direction of legislative improvement to standardize the judicial handling of bribery from procedural law in practice And then it is a reasonable choice to give the bribe a “criminal witness” status.