关于李泽厚的美学思想,我过去写过一些批评文章,往往是从一个时期的言论,或只是就他一个方面的问题,提出意见,指明错误。因而我自己也感到不够全面或不算透彻。主要由于这位美学家的思想既有发展,而立论态度也有变化;加以他还要自创新词如所谓“积淀”之类,却未能充分解释,因而意义模糊;又好发怪论如所谓“自然的社会性”或“感性中的理性”等,显然违反常识,也不加应有论证,对于我这样的读者也难于捉摸,而不能有所评论。然而更使我遗憾的是,如我曾说、我对他的批评“似乎在和影子搏斗,我的努力都落了空,实际的对象还巍 As for Li Zehou’s aesthetics, I wrote some critical articles in the past, often from the comments made in one period or just one aspect of his question, pointing out mistakes. So I myself feel not enough comprehensive or not thoroughly. Mainly due to the development of the thought of the esthetician and the change of the attitude of his argument. He also wanted to create his own new words such as the so-called “accumulation” and the like, but did not fully explain the meaning, thus making the meaning vague; Natural sociality or rationalism in sensibility clearly violate common sense and lack justification. They are also elusive to readers like myself and can not be commented on. What makes me regrettable, however, is that, as I said, my criticism of him "seems to be wrestling with shadows and my efforts are all gone. The actual target is still weak